高级口译全真题.pdfVIP

今天给各位分享高级口译全真题.pdfVIP的知识，其中也会对高级口译全真题.pdfVIP进行解释，如果能碰巧解决你现在面临的问题，别忘了关注本站，现在开始吧！

本文导读目录：

1、2022年高级口译阅读真题分析4

2、翻译资格考试高级口译模拟试题及答案

3、高级口译全真题.pdfVIP

　　新东方在线英语频道给大家整理的相关内容，希望能够对大家的英语考试备考有所帮助，更多有关英语的备考内容，欢迎随时关注新东方在线英语频道。 　　真题分析 四 　　2002年9月 section2 6-10 　　Reading Objectives: 进一步理解example的功能，熟悉按时间顺序写作的方式 　　Bill Gates is not the only American entrepreneur with business plan to save 　　the world.There are thousands. Consider Steve Kirsch, who had just turned 35 　　when he had everything he could want.Adobe, the software giant, had just 　　purchased one of his startups, Eframe, The sale made Kirsch very rich, with a 　　share in a private jet, an estate in California' s Los Altos Hills and a burning 　　question: what to do with the rest of a 50 million fortune? After a few years of 　　doling out money to traditional charities-his alma mater, the United Way-Kirsch 　　got ambitious. He set up his own foundation to benefit "everyone", funding 　　research on everything from cancer to near-earth objects. "It is guaranteed that 　　we will be hit by an asteroid sometime in the future, "perhaps "before we end 　　this phone conversation. "Kirsch explains. "It would cost several billion lives, 　　and we can save those lives for 50 million, which is less than the cost of a 　　private jet. I call it enlightened self-interest." 　　对应题目 　　6. Why does the author introduce some American millionaires at the 　　beginning of the passage? 　　(A) To introduce the rapid growth of American millionaires. 　　(B) To show how they become millionaires. 　　(C) To display the relationship between business and philanthropy. 　　(D) To explain their changing attitude towards charities. 　　Example功能题 　　Startups：创业公司 　　dole out捐款 　　alma mater(拉丁词)母校 　　alumna校友 　　alumni 男校友 　　alumnae女校友 　　self-interest　谋求私利 　　American philanthropy isn't what it used to be. 　　American philanthropy isn't what it used to be.：时间强对比的暗示 　　本句推断出了第六题的答案。 　　Gone are the days when old money was doled out by bureaucrats from 　　mahogany-paneled rooms. 　　More people are giving out more money than ever before, at much younger 　　ages, and to a much wider variety of causes. In the 1980s, Ronald Reagan's call 　　for private charity to replace government largesse was greeted with hoots of 　　liberal derision-and an outbreak of giving. 　　Largesse：慷慨 　　Hoot：嘲讽 　　Derision：嘲讽 　　Outbreak：爆发 　　The number of private foundations rose from 22, 000 in 1980 to 55, 000 　　today. They now dole out about 23.3 billion a year, a 700 percent increase since 　　1980. 　　And many are the offspring of capitalists, who bring the language of 　　business to charity. Vanessa Kirsch, president and founder of the 　　entrepreneurial charity New Profit Inc., says, "There's this new breed of social 　　entrepreneurs coming out of Harvard Business School or failed dot-coms, and 　　they're saying, ‘I want to make big things happen.’" 　　对应题目： 　　7. The author mentions Ronald Reagan's call for private charity to replace 　　government largesse as . 　　(A) Ronald Reagan was the then American President 　　(B) his call was severely criticized by the public 　　(C) Ronald Reagan first understood the significance of private 　　foundations 　　(D) his call received mixed responses but pointed the way for 　　philanthropy 　　注：first, all, only not at all, most, never等绝对选项不选 　　如果一个答案能够包容另一个答案，我们通常选择可以包容其他答案的那一个。 　　8. The expression "who bring the language of business to charity" from the 　　sentence "And many are the offspring of capitalists, who bring the language of 　　business to charity. "(Para. 2) means . 　　(A) who run charities in the same way as they run businesses 　　(B) who uphold the principles of business in managing charities 　　(C) who manage the money they send to charities 　　(D) who think philanthropists should receive training 　　Their outlook is increasingly global, in the Gates mold. The share of 　　funding that the 1, 000 largest foundations devote to international causes 　　jumped from 11.3 percent in 1999 to 16.3 percent in 2000. And while the U.S. 　　government is often criticized for stingy foreign aid (well under 1 percent of 　　GNP each year), the same can't be said of private donors, who now give away 2.1 　　percent of U.S.GNP each year. "No nation comes even remotely close to the U.S. 　　on these things, "says Scott Walker of the Philanthropy Roundtable. "If you're 　　in Sweden or France, it's something the government is supposed to do. If you 　　were in England, it is the nobility. Americans don't think it's enough to say, 　　‘I gave at the office with taxes.’" 　　Sweden or France：出现多个地点，地点强对比，有可能是考点所在 　　9. Which of the following can be concluded from Scott Walker's 　　comment(Para. 3)? 　　(A) Charities in European countries are run by the governmental 　　department. 　　(B)America should earnestly learn the practice of charity from France and 　　Sweden. 　　(C) European countries should learn from American charity. 　　(D) The concept of American charity is different from that of European 　　ones. 　　To be sure, business and philanthropy are old bedfellows in the United 　　States. The Rockefellers, the Carnegies and the Fords set the mold. But many 　　were what Mark Dowie, author of "American Foundations: An Investigative History, 　　"calls" s. o. b. s"?patrons of "symphonies, operas, ballets, "and "museums and 　　hospitals where rich people go to die. "The new foundations are more like 　　"quasi-public trusts　progressive institutions of change, "argues Dowie. 　　The new movers and shakers of American charity are more likely to be flashy 　　TV titans like Ted Turner. The story of how Turner gave away a billion is a 　　founding legend of this class. In a cab on his way to make a speech at the 　　United Nations, the cable titan, sick of official U.S. reluctance to pay U.N. 　　dues, decided to pony up 1 billion himself. This shamed Washington and inspired 　　imitators. "It is a lot more personality-oriented in this culture of new wealth, 　　"says Ellen Dadisman, vice president of the Council on Foundations. "It's sort 　　of like wealth meets People magazine." 　　pony up：一次性付清 　　In Silicon Vallsey, the new fashion is called "venture philanthropy. 　　"According to one survey, 83 percent of valley households give to charity, 　　compared with 69 percent nationally. But they prefer to "invest, "not "give. 　　"And to attract "investors, "fund-raisers promise hands-on management of the 　　nonprofits they support. 　　hands-on management：参与管理方式 　　nonprofit　非盈利机构 　　They demand seats on the board, set performance goals and plan an exit 　　strategy in case expectations aren't met. "Traditionally, foundations have not 　　been as invasive, "says Dadisman. "They didn't go to the nonprofit and say, “How 　　much are you paying for rent? Why are you using these old-fashioned 　　computers?’"It may be invasive, but if it works it could help save the world. 　　Even from asteroids. 　　10. Which of the following is NOT true according to the passage? 　　(A) Charities will become profitable businesses in the future. 　　(B) More people in Silicon Valley give money to charity. 　　(C) Management of charities is required to undergo changes. 　　(D) Foundations are beginning to check how the charities are running. 　　解题总结： 　　文章最重要的句子：American philanthropy isn't what it used to be. 　　Other Reading Skills: 　　一. first, all, only not at all, must, never等绝对选项不选 　　二. 包含性好的选项优先考虑 　　三.地点强对比考点 　　四.强对比突出的是现在 　　以上就是新东方在线英语频道给大家整理的相关内容，希望对大家有所帮助，更多备考内容，欢迎随时关注新东方在线英语频道。　　翻译资格考试高级口译模拟试题及答案NoteTakingandGapFillingGoodafternoon,class.Iwanttostartmylecturebytellingyouastory.OncetherewasayoungwomanfromMexiconamedConsuela,whocametoNewYorktolearnEnglish.ShegotajobatafactoryownedbyaChinese.OnedayasConsuelacametowork,herChinesebosshandedheraredenvelope.Consuelalookedinsideandsaw20dollars.Shebecameveryupsetandthrewtheenvelopebackatherboss!Herbosswasshocked.Well,hehadgivenhertheredenvelopeandthemoneybecauseitwasChineseNewYear.AndontheChineseNewYear,itistraditionaltogivemoneytoyoung,singlepeopleforgoodluck.However,fromConsuela’spointofview,hewasanoldermangivinghermoneyinanenvelope,whichmeantthathewasaskingherforsexualfavors.Naturally,sherefusedtotakethemoney.Now,whatdoesthisstoryshowus?Itshowsthatanactioncanhavetotallyoppositemeaningsindifferentcultures.Everyculturehasitsownrulesforwhatisappropriateandwhatisnotappropriatebehavior.Andtoillustratemypointtoday,I’mgoingtogiveexamplesfromfourareas.First,thewaypeoplegreeteachotherindifferentcultures.Second,thewaytheyusenamesandtitles.Third,thewaypeopleeat.Andfinally,thewaytheyexchangegifts.OK,let’sstartwithgreetingcustoms—Firstofall,I’msureyouknowthatintheUnitedStatesandinmostwesterncountries,greetingsofteninvolvesomesortoftouching,suchasahandshake,ahug,orakissifpeopleknoweachotherverywell.Ontheotherhand,peoplefrommostAsiancountriesdon’tusuallyfeelascomfortabletouchinginpublic.Althoughhandshakesbetweenbusinesspeoplearecommon,manyJapanesepreferabow,whilepeoplefromThailand,normallyholdtheirhandstogetherinakindofprayerposition.SoimaginehowembarrassingitwouldbeifanAmericanwasinvitedtosomeone’shomeinJapanorThailandandshetriedtohugthehost!Now,anotherbehaviorthatdiffersfromculturetocultureistheuseofnames.HaveyounoticedthatAmericansarequicktousepeople’sfirstnameseveniftheyhavejustmet.Forinstance,visitorstotheUnitedStatesarealwayssurprisedtohearemployeesspeaktotheirbossesusingfirstnames.Incontrast,peopleinmostotherculturesaremoreformalandprefertobeaddressedasMr.BrownorMr.Honda,forexample.Inaddition,insomecountries,suchasItalyorKorea,peoplelikeyoutoincludetheirtitleorpositionwiththeirfamilynames,especiallyifthey’reuniversitygraduatesorownersofabusiness.NowIwanttolookateatingcustoms.I’lltalkaboutthebehaviorsconnectedwitheatingthatvaryfromculturetoculture.Oneoftheseistheuseofutensils.YouprobablyknowthatpeopleinmanyAsianculturesusechopsticksbutinsomecountriesit’scustomarytoeatwithyourfingers.It’simportanttobeawareofdifferentdiningcustoms.Hereisanotherexample.Insomecultures,eatingeverythingonyourplateisconsideredimpolite.InEgyptandChina,youshouldleavesomefoodinyourdishattheendofthemeal.Thisistoshowthatyourhostsweregenerousandgaveyoumorethanenoughtoeat.However,Americansgenerallyconsideracleanplateasasignofsatisfactionwiththefood.Finally,whatIwanttomentiontodayisgiftgiving,whichyoumaythinkisauniversalcustomandthereisnotmuchvariationfromculturetoculture.Buttherulesofgiftgivingcanbeverycomplicated.InUSA,ifyou’reinvitedtosomeone’shomefordinner,bringwineorflowersorsmallitemasapresent.Ontheotherhand,theJapanesegivegiftsquitefrequently,oftentothanksomeone,suchasateacheroradoctor.IntheJapaneseculture,giftgivingisaveryancienttraditionandithasmanydetailedrules.Anotherinterestingfactaboutgiftgivingisthatmanycultureshavestrictrulesaboutgiftsyoushouldnotgive.Forexample,nevergiveyellowflowerstopeoplefromIran,whichmeansyouhatethem!【评析】本文题材对考生来说并不陌生，是老生常谈的文化差异。作者先从一个故事引入，再从四个方面(打招呼，称谓，饮食及送礼)介绍各国不同的风俗习惯。做笔记时，从这四个角度进行归类，记下关键的实词，相信正确答案就近在咫尺了。【难词】bown.鞠躬addressv.称呼utensiln.餐具universaladj.普遍的'，通用的SentenceTranslation1.High-school-ageboysaremorelikelytobeobesethantheirfemalecounterparts.Only30%ofhigh-school-ageboysgettherecommended60minutesofdailyexercise.高中男生比同龄女生更容易肥胖。只有30%的高中男生达到了推荐的每天1小时的运动量。2.Innovationislikeabambooshoot.Abambooshootspendsmanyyearsunderground,andthenitjustpeaksitsheaduplikeaseedinganditjustshowsupveryquickly.创新就像竹笋。竹笋深埋地下多年之后，就像种子一样破土而出、快速成长。3.Wal-Martwillbeofferingsomeonlinespecialsasearlyas8:00a.m.onThanksgiving.Someofthein-storedealswillalsobeavailableonline,butotherswillbeInternet-onlyspecials.沃尔玛将在感恩节早上八点提供网购特价产品。一些实体店商品也可以在网上买到，但还有一些只供网路销售。4.Smallcompaniescan’tgetthecredittheyneed.Statisticsshowthatabigdropinlandingtosmallbusinessesinthelastquarterof2012andconditionsthatremaintightthrough2013.小公司不能获得他们想要的贷款了。数据表　　高级口译全真题 　　目 录 　　高级 口译岗位资格证书考试大纲(2 002 年版) 4 　　试卷一 9 　　上海市英语高级 口译资格证书第 • 段考试 9 　　SECTION 1: LISTENING TEST (30 m in

---

高级口译全真题.pdfVIP的介绍就聊到这里吧，感谢你花时间阅读本站内容，更多关于高级口译全真题.pdfVIP、高级口译全真题.pdfVIP的信息别忘了在本站进行查找喔。